| Author | Post |
|---|
ng@woodgate
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 25th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Mana: |  |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31st, 2006 11:16 am |
|
| We use cafam for various light aircraft and JAR OPs operators, during a recent update of AMP it was noticed that the 3 Piper chieftains under contract, "lost" approx 200 hours from total A/F hours, no other a/c types were affected. Has this happened to anyone else?
|
pd@scotairways
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 1st, 2006 04:28 pm |
|
Hello ng
We carry out regular updates and have not encountered this problem
pd
|
pd@scotairways
Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 08:36 am |
|
Apologies ng!!!
One of our aircraft (out of seven) 'lost' in excess of 200 hours during our most recent update (when we went from 5e39 to 5e44) but updating the hours in the usual way resolved the problem. Samples of component and inspection hours were accomplished afterwards and nothing was amiss.
(I was on leave and missed the 'fun'!!!)
pd
|
ph@flybe
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 36 |
| Mana: | |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23rd, 2006 09:06 am |
|
Hi NG,
Luckily we have had no instances of airframe hours shifting after an update. But I do have one warning from our experience of updates.
If the revision requires Amendstru and for any reason the execute file falls over half way through, don't just run it again, give JD a call.
I made the mistake of just running the execute file a second time and made a complete mess of one of the database files. To be honest I think in most cases I would have been OK it was just the changes that this particular amendment made.
Best to be sure by speaking to JD.
|
Current time is 10:58 pm | |
|
